Thomas Aquinas further developed the theory roughly 900 years later, providing theological and systematic conscience-based underpinnings for the pursuit of war. People have pondered the concept of just war for millennia, with early Christian discussion attributed to Ambrose (ca.
#ENOLA GAY CREW MANIFESTO HOW TO#
(As might be expected, of course, there’s no wide agreement on exactly how to interpret or apply these principles, especially if one side sees the other as subhuman.) This final point overlaps with a second set of principles, jus in bello, which specifies right conduct in war, including a prohibition against killing civilians. The theory also specifies that war must be a last resort, be declared by a proper authority, stem from right intentions, and have a reasonable chance of success, and that the ends must be proportional to the means. A commonly invoked “just cause” is self-defense against aggression, although this has been broadly applied to intervening in a public evil or injustice in another nation. Leaders base their right to go to war on a set of principles known as jus ad bellum. Western nations have long looked to “just war theory” to defend military action, finding in it a cleansing of wartime behavior. Retired brigadier general Paul Tibbets, on dropping the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima (“ Reflections on Hiroshima,” 1989) “We cannot look at the so-called grimmer aspects of it, because there is no morality in warfare. The fear of a German weapon was enough to drive researchers forward. The project thus went forward without a moral or ethical North Star or guiding principle, and without considering future risks to humanity. Scientific advancement is often divorced from moral or ethical responsibilities, instead leaving such discussions to philosophy, ethics or religion. It’s remarkable, in retrospect, that nuclear arms developers gave so little thought to the morality of the technology. Since then the world has trembled in uncertainty at the presence of these weapons in the arsenals of nations. On that August morning in 1945, the world was plunged into a nuclear arms race of existential proportions.
The lens of time offers a great advantage when evaluating historic decisions. As a result the United States began its own atomic program, code-named the Manhattan Project.
The letter warned of Germany’s potential for developing an atomic weapon and urged “quick action on the part of the Administration” to counter the threat. Their genesis was a letter signed by Albert Einstein, drafted in August 1939 in collaboration with physicist Leo Szilard and delivered to US president Franklin D. The drumbeat continued with the creation of Little Boy and Fat Man, the names given those first atomic weapons. Spear throwers, longbows, Greek fire, gunpowder, cannons, rifled weapons, minié balls, machine guns, rocket launchers-the drum beat out an increasingly ominous cadence as weapons boasted ever-greater killing and destructive power. Humankind for millennia has sought new technologies to gain advantage over military opponents. In a 1982 interview he described the smoke and debris he had seen below: “After the bomb exploded, you couldn’t see that there was a city down there at all it was covered with a-the only way I can describe it is it looked like a black, boiling mess of tar.” Paul Tibbets was the commander of Enola Gay, the aircraft that delivered the first bomb. About 40,000 people died in an instant, with thousands more to follow. Three days later a second bomb fell on Nagasaki. Four square miles of the city suffered utter destruction. In 43 seconds, the world would change forever.Īn estimated 80,000 people succumbed immediately when the bomb exploded overhead thousands more would die later as a result of radiation poisoning. But at that moment, from a height of nearly six miles, an American warplane was dropping an atomic bomb on the Japanese city. on the nearly cloudless morning of August 6, 1945, residents of Hiroshima were settling in to their daily routines.